Check my flight

Language

Flight problems

Flight delayed or cancelled by bad weather: what you can still claim

Last verified on October 4, 2026Sources & methodology5 min read

Bad weather

The short answer

Weather that makes it unsafe to operate your flight is an extraordinary circumstance, so the airline does not owe the €250 to €600 compensation if it proves that and shows it took all reasonable measures. It still owes meals, a hotel if needed, and the choice between re-routing and a refund. Ordinary bad weather, or weather on an earlier flight, is not automatically enough.

Compensation
Not due if weather made the flight unsafe
Burden of proof
On the airline (Art. 5(3))
Meals, hotel, re-routing
Always owed
Knock-on delays
Need a direct causal link
On this page
  1. When weather counts as extraordinary
  2. The “all reasonable measures” test
  3. Knock-on delays from earlier flights
  4. What the airline owes in any weather
  5. What to do
  6. Other regimes
  7. From 23 October 2027

“Weather” is the reason airlines give most often when refusing compensation, partly because passengers rarely question it. Sometimes it is true and the refusal is correct. The law asks for more than the word, though, and the parts of your rights that do not depend on the cause stay in place.

When weather counts as extraordinary

Recital 14 of Regulation 261/2004 lists “meteorological conditions incompatible with the operation of the flight concerned” among the events that may be extraordinary circumstances. Two phrases matter.

Incompatible with the operation. Rain, wind or cold that an airline flies through every week is not enough. The conditions must have made the flight unsafe or impossible:

  • An airport closed by snow.
  • A storm beyond the aircraft’s limits.
  • Fog below landing minima.
  • A volcanic ash cloud closing airspace.

The flight concerned. The weather has to affect your flight.

Recital 15 adds a second route: an air traffic management decision on a particular day that causes a long delay or cancellation. Weather often reaches flights this way, through reduced capacity ordered by air traffic control.

SituationLikely outcome
Airport closed or runway unusable because of snow, storm or floodingExtraordinary
Air traffic control restrictions imposed because of weatherExtraordinary (recital 15)
Lightning strike requiring a mandatory safety inspectionExtraordinary (CJEU, C-399/24)
Winter conditions the airport and airline should be equipped for, such as routine de-icingOpen to challenge: the airline must show it could not have avoided the delay
Your flight cancelled while other airlines flew the same route at the same timeOpen to challenge
Weather affected a different flight earlier in the dayOnly with a direct causal link (CJEU, TAP, C-74/19)

The “all reasonable measures” test

Watch out

An extraordinary event does not release the airline by itself.

Under Art. 5(3) the airline must also prove that the cancellation or delay could not have been avoided even if all reasonable measures had been taken. The Court of Justice has explained what that means:

  • The airline must have used all the staff, equipment and financial resources at its disposal, short of intolerable sacrifices for its business (CJEU, Wallentin-Hermann, C-549/07).
  • When planning its flights, it must build in a reserve of time so that it can operate the flight once the extraordinary event ends (CJEU, Eglītis, C-294/10).
  • It must re-route passengers by the earliest available option, including direct or indirect flights on other airlines. Putting you on its own next flight a day later is not enough if something earlier existed (CJEU, TAP, C-74/19).

So a storm that closed the airport from 14:00 to 16:00 does not automatically excuse a flight that finally left at 23:00, or one that was cancelled although the airport had reopened.

Knock-on delays from earlier flights

Aircraft fly several rotations a day. A common refusal says the aircraft was late because of weather somewhere else that morning.

In TAP (C-74/19) the Court of Justice accepted that an airline can rely on an extraordinary circumstance that affected a previous flight operated by the same aircraft.

The condition is a direct causal link between that event and the delay or cancellation of your flight, which the airline must prove and the national court must check.

The more rotations and hours between the weather and your flight, the harder that is to show, because the airline had time to react: swap aircraft, use a standby crew, absorb the delay in turnaround time.

Tip

Ask the airline which flight was affected, at which airport, at what time, and what it did afterwards to recover the schedule.

What the airline owes in any weather

These rights apply whatever the cause:

  • Care. Meals and drinks in reasonable relation to the wait, two phone calls or emails, hotel accommodation and transfers when an overnight stay is needed (Art. 9).
    • In McDonagh (C-12/11) a passenger was stranded for a week when volcanic ash closed European airspace.
    • The Court held that the airline owed care for the whole period, with no time or money limit in the regulation, and that a passenger left without it can recover reasonable expenses.
  • Refund or re-routing. For a cancellation, or a delay of five hours or more, you choose (Art. 8).
  • Information. A written notice of your rights (Art. 14).

Details are in flight delay and flight cancellation.

What to do

  1. At the airport, ask for meal vouchers and, if you are stuck overnight, a hotel. If refused, keep receipts and stay within reasonable prices.
  2. Take a photo of the departures board. It shows which flights left.
  3. Ask the airline in writing for the precise reason and the evidence.
  4. If the answer is vague, or the weather was on an earlier rotation, send a claim using the claim letter. The burden of proof is on the airline, not on you.
  5. If it refuses again, see how to claim.

Other regimes

  • UK: the same test applies under UK261.
  • Brazil: material assistance (food after two hours, accommodation after four when an overnight stay is needed) and the choice of re-accommodation or refund apply whatever the cause, including weather (ANAC Resolution 400).
  • United States: weather gives a right to a refund if the flight is cancelled or significantly delayed and you do not travel, and nothing more under federal rules (US DOT rules).

From 23 October 2027

Regulation (EU) 2026/2202 adds an annex of extraordinary circumstances that includes weather conditions, and weather damage to the aircraft, incompatible with the safe operation of the flight. It requires a direct causal link, to be proved by the airline.

It also allows airlines to limit hotel accommodation to three nights when the disruption is caused by extraordinary circumstances.

Good to know

Until it applies, there is no such limit.

Frequently asked questions

Can I get compensation if my flight was cancelled because of weather?

Not if the weather really made your flight unsafe and the airline could not have avoided the cancellation with reasonable measures. It has to prove both. If other airlines were flying the same route at the same time, or the weather was at a different airport on an earlier flight, the refusal is worth challenging.

Does the airline have to pay for my hotel during a storm?

Yes. The duty of care in Article 9 has no weather exception and no limit in time or money under the current rules, as the Court of Justice confirmed in McDonagh, C-12/11, about the 2010 volcanic ash closure. If the airline offers nothing, pay reasonable costs yourself and claim them back with receipts.

The aircraft was late because of weather on its previous flight. Is that extraordinary?

It can be. In TAP, C-74/19, the Court of Justice accepted that an airline may rely on an event that hit an earlier flight of the same aircraft, but only if it proves a direct causal link to your delay and that it took all reasonable measures in between.

How do I check whether the weather was really that bad?

Look at the airport's departures for the same hours on a flight-tracking site and note which flights left. Ask the airline in writing for the specific weather event, the airport affected, and the evidence, such as weather reports or air traffic control restrictions. A general statement is not proof.

Is a lightning strike on the aircraft an extraordinary circumstance?

Yes. In AirHelp v Austrian Airlines, C-399/24, decided in October 2025, the Court of Justice held that a lightning strike that leads to mandatory safety inspections is extraordinary. The airline must still show it took all reasonable measures, for example trying to find a replacement aircraft.

Official sources

Last verified on October 4, 2026. This page is general information, not legal advice. Rules and court decisions change, so check the date above.

Related pages